Видео

I don't understand the hate either. In many ways the F-35 is the most successful US military hardware program of ALL TIME! The Military Industrial Complex and it's Shareholders made a BUNDLE of money and will continue to make a bundle of money off of the helpless American taxpayer. Fat Amy is a Golden Goose. Those dang Russians and their rusted shovels and washing machine circuit boards can only WISH they had a military hardware procurement process like the USA...

F.- 35 cannot compete with J -20

Russia has always struggled to keep up with the USA they had a economic collapse during the cold war. Even today they struggle to compete and keep up with modern American made jets. A example being the US made F-15C was created and went on to be one of the greatest air superiority fighters of all time, and mostly because of the false claims of the Mig 25 Foxbat being a extreme threat which got everyone worked up for apparently nothing.

The su57 engines catch on fire spontaneously so that the raptor can’t claim the kill when it bursts into flames and falls out of the sky. The Russians are crafty. It’s kinda like fighter jet sepiku. But Russian.

While it ain't stealthy, it's definitely powerful, it's the most manuverable

The F-35 isn't "the most lethal" fighter in the world, the F-22 Raptor is.

Looks like they couldn’t shift to neutral.

So, now that China has publicly lambasted the T-14 all across state sponsored TV for NOT BEING ANYTHING THEY CLAIM IT IS, NOT HAVING ANYTHING THEY CLAIM IT DOES, the sites are out of the previous generation, decommissioned LeClerc tanks being sold to the public, the countermeasures systems don't actually work and the engine is in fact a HUMONGOUS HUNK of SHIT........WHAT NOW? Even India told them to eatadick after getting screwed on the T-90's because at sea level is the only place you can drive them. They tried to drive them at elevation, the engines lost most of their power, boost is already at max pressure that the heads can hold, they can't breath and are overheating to the point of rupturing the coolant system. I always wondered why their tank barrels were 40 feet long and didn't have the range of an Abrams...it's because their powder is inconsistent, low expansion volume, low burn rate and like the AK round, their tank projectiles have a small bearing surface interaction with the barrel which means they wobble down the barrel effecting accuracy and let's pressure escape the barrel before the round ever leaves......when we're any of these pieces of shit the tanks everyone thinks are so great?? Everyone tries to give the Abrams shit and say it sucks, it's KNOCKED THE FUCK OUT everything Russian it's had in front of it...and never been taken out by anything Russian....wtf? Why, because it gets bad gas mileage....waaaa, we don't have a fucking logistics problem, our tanks don't go thirsty! Our boys don't loot stores for food because they're starving on their own front porch and don't have ammo. Russian sycophants infuriate me to no end. You're just liars.

Sorry but until this ancient piece of junk is combat ready and certified I will keep laughing. Our military has been ripped off by the corporations mediocre innovations.Patriot missile ? Junk. Abrams ?junk. Aircraft carriers are target practice.Woke military fantasies!!!

They hate it bcuz there’s country don’t have its

F-22s all drooling at the mouth saying "where can I find one.... I'd like to intercept..."

Mud > abrams. That is all.

T 14 is a stealth tank... Hmmm...thats why we havent seen it yet anywhere....till now

if the americans want to "see" the su 57 and 75 , they better start funding the russians than ukraine or nato lol

But the Russian tank is worse Soviet tanks are better than Russian tanks btw they say

The Russians are winning

Never believe what these people say they know as much about it as me or you.

They will never give you the correct dimensions of the fadar cross section. It is called dissinformation. Becareful of this propagander tool

Lol the ukranians hit one with a long range drone you'd think that the russians would keep their premier fith gen fighter in a hardened hangar but i guess hangar technology is too much for the russians.

Small correction: The gun has a recoil of 45kn, the eninges have 40kn each, so 80. Still, it would feel like stepping on a brake, but it would not come to a complete stop or accelerate backwards

Coping mechanism.

Id ad that those engines are not stealth designrd and from the back it is no stealthier than the Flanker.

Impressive!!

You, people, are exposing your ignorance. Indian Govt is not worried about stealth fighter planes because Indian Govt gives importance to Supersonic and Hypersonic missiles. The Chinese economy will go down within 20 years. Watch this Video, China’s Tofu-Dreg Tank Joins a Contest, Loses Wheels, and Falls to Pieces! Russians Laugh Heartily. ruclips.net/video/NNxbh-fruV8/видео.html

its called the su 57 felon because calling it a 5th gen fighter is criminal

Dear author, you' d better envy silent )) Any disputes can be resolved only in battle.

Keep in mind that incident with the nighthawk was done on low frequency radar now the majority of "anti stealth" russian radar is ran on low frequency this is the level of intelligence you get with russia

The circle of military development Russia lies about the strength of its new thing US / europe makes a better verion of russias claims Turns out russia lied and the new thing is bad Rinse and repeat

lol the crew needs a toilet microwave and a bed 😂😂

Your video is out of date, and its conclusion is shockingly wrong!

They’re not medium tanks, medium tanks stopped being things after the M60, the only two types are Main battle tanks and light tanks

我唯一有意見的 每次看到了座艙蓋裡的 引爆索上的矽利康是那個傢伙塗的 ？

Just shocked they made a single engine carrier based fighter…

Reverse engineering seems a bad idea it just a copy cat thats the only thing I see what do you spect from a cheap stealth technology it's capability is also cheap and no one wants to buy china jet

It’s like watching a boxer taken on a sniper

the russians really need to start upgrading their reverse gears the ukraines were able to upgrade the oplot and a other private company also advertise better reverse gears for T-64 and T-72 type vehicles what happend with them I dont know a simple upgrade could be to take the T-80BVM hull (Maybe change the UFP layout to the same as the T-90A since its better and newer) and just slap the T-90M turret on top optionaly change the Autoloader to the same AZ autoloader or keep the MZ but would mean no extra shield around the autoloader that would atleast increase the reverse somewhat and make it more mobile while keeping its armor protection and better FCS plus turret armor obvious negative impact would by the increased fuel consumption

Its mind boggling that other countries aside from the usa dont have adequate military budgets to midernize and adaot theur arsenals

A cheap low grade propaganda hit piece attacking the other side's tech is as childish as it is uninformed, let's wait and see as it will all kick off very soon.

I remember a few years back when there were a lot of home grown experts finding any number of supposed faults with F35. Never hear from them now. I am not an expert either but when I see major countries with very smart people buying it I must assume they know something the home grown naysayers don’t know. Laserpig sums it all up nicely. Watch his show on the F35. Game changing steps forward in their day such as M1 Abrams, F35, F14, Ford class carrier, F22 etc always take longer than expected and cost more than expected. But if it didn’t you are probably making a big step forward.

Wait, did 33 minutes just pass???

Lucky for China, the democratic party of the United States has been selling them our military secrets for decades!

Challanger is inferior to even T-72

Funny that to you are comparing it to the F22. Which has a lower quality radar. The F35 is inferior to it in actually all aspects .. And the F22 is being phased out...

Engine with minimal changes made? That thing, Sla 16? They arent the same. They might look similar, but thats it. If it was the same and tuned up, they wouldnt had and troubles with it to begin with.

TLDR large amounts of both russian propaganda and idiots like pier sprey who where still stuck in the 50s and 60s when missiles where still relatively unreliable

Su-57 is so stealty it has never been seen in combat😭

I think you missed the main reason people hate the F-35, which has nothing to do with its actual capabilities, and only partially has to do with its cost. When the F-35 entered public consciousness, we were at the turning point in the war on terror. Not that the war took a turn, it was futile imperialist adventurism from start to finish, but people were starting to realize our military was doing more harm than good. We outgunned the countries we were invading by truly staggering margins, which cost a lot of money, but it didn't make a difference in the outcome of the wars. We weren't defending ourselves, we weren't liberating anyone, and the region is in worse shape than before we got involved. In that context, any top of the line project looks bad, because no matter how much the plane costs, dropping bombs on weddings creates more enemies than it ever eliminates. With its troubled development and high sticker price, the F-35 was an easy stand in for the whole failed system. And if all the F-35 did was drop bombs on third world countries, it would be correct to hate it. But in recent years, the US has taken a half step back from the Middle East (which isn't enough, but it is a start), and between China's saber-rattling, and Russia's unprovoked invasion of Ukraine and threats to continue on into NATO countries, the focus of our military is back where it should be: defending against actual threats. And that is where the F-35 actually makes sense. Russia and China have air forces and ground based air defenses that are actually quite substantial, so stealth and advanced sensors are actually needed. To act as a deterrence to further Russian aggression, we need a credible threat against them, and while modernized F-16s and F-15s can do that job to an extent, the F-35 does it better. It is good that the people developing the F-35 built it for future wars, not just to be more efficient for foolish regime change wars and occupation of foreign lands, because it is positioned to to the job we actually need our military for.

I like the A-10 and have pondered how well it'd do in Ukraine since the Su-25s seem to be doing ok. Now that I said I like the A-10, I'm not going to pretend it's the greatest thing ever and I do think it should be retired. I love the Hornet and Pig too but those had to be retired as well (RAAF service) like all things.

TheMighty🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳💯😘💪💪💪

I do disagree with one thing, as the T-14 doesn’t have any revolutionary tech or ideas, as the ideas it is built on was already made by the US